First Aid Advice & Guidance

What is the difference between an appointed person and a first aider, when is each required, and what should employers consider in practice?


Quick answer

An appointed person and a first aider are not the same.

An appointed person takes charge of the organisation’s first-aid arrangements, such as looking after equipment and facilities and calling the emergency services when required.

A first aider has appropriate first-aid training and is competent to provide first aid. Your first-aid needs assessment determines which level of provision your workplace requires.1

An appointed person takes charge of the first-aid arrangements. A trained first aider provides first aid.

What is an appointed person?

HSE describes an appointed person as someone who is in charge of the organisation’s first-aid arrangements.1

Their core role includes looking after first-aid equipment and facilities and calling the emergency services when required.

HSE also states that an appointed person does not need formal first-aid training, and an appointed person must be available whenever people are at work.1

An employer can appoint more than one person where necessary to provide adequate coverage.

What is a first aider?

A workplace first aider is someone who has undertaken appropriate first-aid training and is competent to provide first aid.

The level of training required depends on the findings of the employer’s first-aid needs assessment. This might involve Emergency First Aid at Work (EFAW), First Aid at Work (FAW), or additional training where particular workplace hazards or needs justify it.2

The first aider’s role therefore extends beyond organising the arrangements: they can assess and provide first-aid care within the scope of their training and competence.

What is the difference between an appointed person and a first aider?

Appointed person

Takes charge of the organisation’s first-aid arrangements.

  • Looks after first-aid equipment and facilities
  • Calls emergency services when required
  • Does not need a formal first-aid qualification
  • Is not automatically competent to provide first aid

First aider

Has appropriate first-aid training and provides first aid within their competence.

  • Responds directly to illness or injury
  • Provides first aid within their training
  • May hold EFAW, FAW or other relevant training
  • May also undertake organisational first-aid duties
The distinction is between managing the arrangements and being trained to provide the care.

What does “take charge of first-aid arrangements” actually mean?

This wording matters.

HSE says an appointed person is someone who takes charge of the first-aid arrangements. It then explains that this includes looking after the equipment and facilities and calling the emergency services.1

That should not be interpreted as meaning that an untrained appointed person must take clinical charge of an injured or ill casualty.

The words “take charge” can sound broader when separated from the rest of HSE’s explanation. In context, the role concerns organising and activating the first-aid arrangements.

“In charge of the arrangements” is not the same as “clinically in charge of the casualty”.

When is an appointed person enough?

The answer comes from the employer’s first-aid needs assessment.

HSE states that where the assessment indicates that a trained first aider is not necessary, the minimum requirement is to appoint someone to take charge of first-aid arrangements.3

This is more likely to arise in smaller or lower-hazard workplaces, although employers should not decide the issue from headcount or workplace type alone.

Consider the actual workforce, hazards, working patterns, premises, accident history, absence cover and other relevant circumstances before deciding that an appointed person alone provides adequate cover.

Our full guide explains that process:

Read: First Aid Needs Assessment →

Can an appointed person give first aid?

Being appointed does not itself qualify someone to provide first aid.

HSE is explicit that appointed persons are not first aiders and should not attempt to give first aid for which they have not been trained.3

This does not mean that the person must stand back and do nothing during an emergency.

They can activate the organisation’s emergency arrangements, call 999, obtain equipment, direct others, meet the emergency services and follow instructions given by the emergency call handler.

Where the individual has received particular emergency training, they may also act within that training and competence.

Can an appointed person perform CPR?

An appointed person is not automatically trained or competent to perform CPR simply because they hold the appointed-person role.

HSE says appointed persons should not attempt first aid for which they have not been trained.3

If, however, the appointed person has received appropriate CPR training, that training gives them practical capability that the appointment alone does not.

The same principle applies to the use of an AED. Health and safety law does not generally require a workplace to provide an AED, although HSE notes that fuller training is likely to make users more confident where one is provided.4

Does an appointed person need first-aid training?

Legally, no.

HSE states that appointed persons do not need first-aid training in order to fulfil the role, although emergency first-aid training is available.3

That is the regulatory position.

The Hive view: minimum compliance and practical preparedness are not always the same question

Where an organisation relies on an appointed person rather than a formally trained workplace first aider, we would normally encourage the employer to consider giving that person at least some basic emergency training.

In particular, CPR and AED awareness or practical training can give the appointed person greater confidence and useful capability if somebody suddenly collapses.

This is a professional good-practice recommendation from The Hive Collaborative. It is not a legal requirement for someone to act as an appointed person.

Where the first-aid needs assessment identifies that a trained first aider is required, basic CPR or AED training alone does not replace the appropriate workplace first-aid qualification.

Could an appointed person be mistaken for a first aider?

Yes — and employers should think about this possibility when designing and communicating their arrangements.

Imagine the situation

An employee suddenly collapses.

Someone shouts, “Who is the first aider?”

Another employee answers, “It’s C.”

Colleagues gather around and everyone looks to C to deal with the casualty.

But C is not a trained first aider. C is the organisation’s appointed person.

The distinction may be perfectly clear in the employer’s documentation, but it may be completely invisible to the people standing around the casualty.

Employees and members of the public cannot reasonably be expected to understand every technical distinction within workplace first-aid regulation.

If somebody has simply been introduced as “the person responsible for first aid”, colleagues may naturally assume that they are trained to provide it.

That can place the appointed person in a difficult position. They may feel pressure to provide care beyond their training or competence at exactly the moment when calm, clear action matters most.

An emergency role should be understood by the people expected to rely upon it.

Do employees need to know who the appointed person is?

Employers should provide employees with information about their workplace first-aid arrangements. HSE specifically includes this as part of the employer’s expected first-aid provision.5

That communication should be clear enough to avoid creating a misleading impression about people’s roles.

Employees should know:

  • who the appointed person is;
  • who the trained first aiders are, where applicable;
  • how to contact them;
  • where first-aid equipment is located;
  • where the AED is located, if one is provided; and
  • how to summon emergency assistance.
Good practice: avoid notices or induction wording that describes an untrained appointed person simply as “the first aider”.

A title can be technically correct and still create confusion if the workforce misunderstands what it means.

How many appointed persons do I need?

HSE says an appointed person must always be available whenever people are at work and confirms that employers can appoint more than one person.1

The practical number therefore depends upon the organisation’s operating arrangements.

Consider different shifts, opening hours, separate premises, holidays, sickness and other periods when an appointed person may be unavailable.

One named person may therefore be sufficient for one workplace but inadequate for another.

Decide what cover must be available first. Then decide how many people are required to maintain it.

Can an appointed person cover an absent first aider?

This requires careful wording.

HSE says an appointed person can provide emergency cover, within their role and competence, where a first aider is absent because of unforeseen circumstances.3

HSE expressly states that annual leave does not count as such an unforeseen circumstance.3

Therefore, if the needs assessment concludes that a trained first aider must normally be available, the employer should make proper arrangements for planned absence.

An appointed person who does not hold the required first-aid training should not simply be treated as a replacement first aider because the trained employee is on holiday.

Planned absence requires planned cover.

Can the same person be both an appointed person and a first aider?

Yes.

A trained first aider may also take responsibility for organising the employer’s first-aid arrangements.

In that situation, the same employee performs two functions: they may manage the arrangements as the appointed person and provide first aid because they separately hold the appropriate training and competence.

The distinction matters because the appointment itself does not create the first-aid competence. The training does.

What additional responsibilities might an employer give an appointed person?

The statutory appointed-person role is relatively narrow, but employers may decide to allocate additional administrative responsibilities.

Depending on the organisation, these might include:

  • checking first-aid kits and replacing used or expired items;
  • monitoring first-aid equipment and facilities;
  • keeping information about trained first aiders up to date;
  • monitoring certificate expiry dates;
  • helping coordinate training and absence cover;
  • maintaining first-aid incident records; or
  • helping ensure employees know the arrangements.

These are not automatically statutory duties of every appointed person. They are responsibilities an employer may sensibly allocate as part of managing the organisation’s first-aid system.

HSE notes that an appointed person or first aider will often look after first-aid incident records, while the employer retains overall responsibility.6

How do you decide whether you need an appointed person or a first aider?

Start with the first-aid needs assessment.

The assessment should consider the nature of the work, hazards and likely injuries or illness, workforce size, working patterns, absence, premises, remoteness, accident history and other relevant circumstances.7

If that assessment shows that a trained first aider is unnecessary, an appointed person may satisfy the minimum personnel requirement.

If the assessment identifies a need for trained first-aid provision, the employer must provide appropriately trained first aiders rather than relying upon an untrained appointed person.

Appointed person or first aider: the key questions

  • Has the organisation completed a first-aid needs assessment?
  • Does that assessment require trained first-aid provision?
  • Is an appointed person available whenever people are at work?
  • Do employees understand the difference between the appointed person and trained first aiders?
  • Could the appointed person reasonably be mistaken for a first aider during an emergency?
  • Would basic CPR and AED training improve practical preparedness?
  • Is planned absence covered appropriately?
  • Do staff know how to summon emergency help and where equipment is located?
The right question is not simply, “Have we appointed somebody?” It is, “Would our first-aid arrangements work clearly and effectively if somebody needed help right now?”

Final thought

The distinction between an appointed person and a first aider looks straightforward on paper.

In a real emergency, it can become much less obvious.

An employer should therefore think beyond job titles and minimum requirements. The people who may rely on the arrangements should understand who can provide first aid, who coordinates the response and how professional assistance will be obtained.

A first-aid arrangement is only useful if people understand what it means when an emergency actually happens.

References and authorities

  1. Health and Safety Executive, Appoint someone to take charge of first aid .
  2. Health and Safety Executive, Are you a first-aider? .
  3. Health and Safety Executive, Frequently asked questions on first aid – appointed persons .
  4. Health and Safety Executive, Automated external defibrillators – training requirements .
  5. Health and Safety Executive, First aid information for employees .
  6. Health and Safety Executive, First-aid record keeping .
  7. Health and Safety Executive, Assess your first aid needs .
About this guidance

Author: Paul Deaves, The Hive Collaborative
Published: August 2026
Last evidence review: August 2026
Next scheduled review: August 2027, or earlier following a material change in legislation, HSE guidance or recognised professional practice.

This guide distinguishes between statutory requirements, HSE guidance and The Hive Collaborative’s professional good-practice recommendations. Where we recommend training beyond the minimum requirement for an appointed person, we identify that recommendation clearly as good practice rather than a legal requirement.

This article provides general workplace first-aid guidance and is not a substitute for legal, medical or workplace-specific competent advice. Employers remain responsible for assessing their own circumstances and determining adequate and appropriate provision.